![]() |
The
Millstone By
William Rivers Pitt t
r u t h o u t | Perspective Monday
09 May 2005 I
have trouble imagining what it must be like to be a Republican these
days. The
party of Lincoln and TR, the party of fiscal responsibility and small
government,
has become so profoundly separated from its roots that it is barely
recognizable anymore. Millions of people who proudly call themselves
Republican
must, I think, be dealing with a quiet yet insistent voice within.
Something,
whispers that voice, has gone wrong.
After
September 11, everything changed. This is what a lot of Republicans
tell
themselves these days. It soothes the disquiet, and offers a
rationalization
for the gigantism that government has undergone under this so-called
Republican
administration. Of course we must make the government huge and
intrusive,
specifically in military and intelligence departments, because
terrorists could
smuggle biological or nuclear weapons into our country and kill tens of
thousands of people. September
11 justifies a lot of things previously considered abominable. That is
what a
lot of Republicans tell themselves these days. No Republican in his
right mind
would have supported something like the Patriot Act before the attacks.
Indeed,
a variety of anti-terrorism actions offered by the Clinton
administration were
shot to pieces by the Republicans in Congress because they were
considered too
invasive. Then, of course, everything changed. Even
the definition of 'invasive' has been altered. Now, it isn't invasive
to sweep
Iraqi civilians off the streets, subject them to torture, rape and
murder, and
blame some hapless dupe of an enlisted woman because she was dumb
enough to be
in the pictures. Surely she thought up the whole thing on her own,
brought the
hoods all the way from home, and even designed degradations
specifically
intended to offend Islam. That makes sense. It doesn't matter, anyway.
Extremism in the defense of virtue is no vice, a Republican once said.
Anything
is permissible in the defense of the homeland. Yet
something funny happened on the way down that road. This so-called
Republican
administration spent a year filling our heads with nightmares. Get your
plastic
sheeting and duct tape ready. On To
arms! To arms! We have to get that stuff out of … Iraq? The battle for
Afghanistan was not over, and is not over even today, and yet money,
men and
material was diverted from that front to Iraq. We went in expecting
hearts and
flowers and managed to put on a nice little statue-toppling show before
the
explosions started and the body bags came out. One a day, two a day,
maybe more
when our helicopters got blasted from the sky - remember the outrage
over
'Blackhawk Down?' - and the slow bleeding commenced. Soldiers, and then
reservists, and then retired reservists forced back into the ranks,
began
traveling a long circle from home to Iraq, back home and then to Iraq,
back
home and then to Iraq again. The
weapons weren't there. Sure, they found a rusted centrifuge that dated
back to
the first Bush administration buried under a rosebush, and some empty
artillery
shells turned up here and there. A bunker full of high explosives was
found,
but because this so-called Republican administration wanted to go
'small' into
Iraq, there weren't enough men to guard it. The explosives got stolen,
and are
being used right now to kill American soldiers. Seven more died this
weekend,
bringing the total to 1,602. The
weapons of mass destruction were sneaked into Syria, say the talking
heads on
radio and TV who live to do nothing besides defend this so-called
Republican
administration. We're fighting Iraqis over there so we don't have to
fight
Iraqis over here. It makes sense in a perversely American way; politics
here
has become more akin to football than to policy, and the point is to
win
arguments through volume rather than get the facts straight. It's a
tribal
thing now, and if you are a Republican you have to back your team.
After all,
you're winning … right? The
weapons of mass destruction are not in Syria. They just weren't
anywhere. This
so-called Republican administration knew that wanting to invade a
country does
not make that invasion legal; not even September 11 could change that
basic
law. They knew they needed a self-defense rationale to pull it off, and
further
knew they needed political cover. The
recently exposed secret British intelligence memo tells the story:
Intelligence
and facts were fixed around the policy of invasion and occupation.
That's what
the memo said, right there in black and white. In other words, the
threat of
WMD was set upon as the justification for self-defense, despite the
fact -
clearly stated in the memo - that Iraq was neither a threat to its
neighbors
nor to the United States.. The daily drumbeat of fear fed to the
American
people provided the political cover, and we were off to the races. I
wonder how hard it is for Republicans to still that little voice within
when
they are confronted with stories like this: The American military in
Iraq has
begun a massive military campaign against several small villages along
the
Euphrates River in Iraq. These villages, say military personnel, are
suspected
of harboring Syrian fighters crossing the border. A thousand U.S.
troops,
backed by helicopter and fighter support, are laying siege to these
small
villages. The incursion has become one large firefight. But
here's the interesting bit. When the troops first approached the
villages, they
did so by night. They were told to use the headlights on their trucks
to spot
mines, and those headlights apparently alerted one of the villages. All
of a
sudden, every light in the village was switched off at the same time.
Apparently, this is how one village warns another village of an
impending
attack. Now,
unless you are able to convince yourself that there is a
border-crossing Syrian
fighter manning each and every light switch in that town, the
conclusion is
unavoidable. We are not fighting a few 'insurgents' here and there, nor
are we
facing foreign fighters. We are fighting the entire country, all of
Iraq, one
small chunk at a time. As defenders of democracy and freedom, we are
probably
going to wind up destroying these villages in order to save them. Where
have I
heard that before? To
be a Republican these days, you have to be in favor of all this. You
have to
support massive centralized government, nation-building, torture, rape,
murder,
the plundering of tax dollars by defense and oil companies, a pestilent
friendship with Saudi Arabia despite the fact that a good deal of
global
terrorism comes straight out of that country, and the eternal
occupation of a
nation that does not want us there and does not believe that we are
bringing
anything like freedom to their doorstep. They just don't buy it.
Convicted
embezzler Ahmad Chalabi was just made the head of the Iraqi Oil
Ministry. Would
you trust a government that made decisions like this? If
I
were a Republican, I'd have a hard time ignoring that little voice. I'd
be up
nights wondering if men like Tom DeLay and the religious extremists he
empowers
as a means of political self-defense are the proper banner-carriers for
my
party. I'd wonder how we are making our nation safer by manufacturing
terrorists in Iraq while ignoring the ones in Saudi Arabia. I'd wonder
where
Osama bin Laden is right now. I'd wonder how a President can talk about
supporting the troops while eviscerating veteran's benefits across the
board.
I'd wonder how a President can talk about supporting the troops while
sending
them into an unwinnable fight without the armor they need to survive it. If
I
were a Republican, I'd be thinking about getting this millstone off my
neck. I
wouldn't become a Democrat, because that's just too crazy. I might
seriously
consider withdrawing my support from this so-called Republican
administration,
because with every word and deed they betray the principles I would
hold dear
as a member of the Grand Old Party. I'd seriously consider cleaning
house, and
restoring my party to something worthy of respect and loyalty. If
I
didn't do these things as a Republican, then everything done in my name
and by my
party would be my responsibility. If I were a Republican, I don't think
I could
stand that burden. |